Pragmatic Asymmetry in Multilingual Academic Communication

Authors

  • Javokhirkhon Nasrullaev Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1997/bc38wh52

Keywords:

pragmatic asymmetry, multilingual communication, academic discourse, politeness strategies, speech act, English, Uzbek, Russian, intercultural communication, higher education

Abstract

This paper examines the problem of pragmatic asymmetry in multilingual academic communication. The study focuses on academic interaction in which English, Uzbek and Russian are used as significant languages of educational, institutional and intercultural communication. The increasing internationalization of higher education, academic mobility, joint educational programmes, English-medium instruction and international project cooperation has intensified the need for pragmatically appropriate communication among participants belonging to different linguistic and cultural traditions. The article argues that academic communication is not limited to the transmission of information. It also reflects social distance, institutional hierarchy, politeness norms, cultural expectations and communicative responsibility. Pragmatic asymmetry appears when interlocutors understand the literal meaning of an utterance but interpret its social and cultural meaning differently. The paper analyzes forms of address, requests, refusals, apologies, gratitude and disagreement as key speech acts in multilingual academic settings. It concludes that successful academic communication requires not only linguistic competence but also pragmatic competence, including the ability to adapt politeness strategies to English, Uzbek and Russian academic contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Javokhirkhon Nasrullaev

    PhD in Philology, Assoc. Prof., DSc Independent Researcher, Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, Uzbekistan

References

Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.

Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Searle, J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983.

Grice, H. P. Logic and Conversation // Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1975. P. 41–58.

Goffman, E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Anchor Books, 1967.

Hall, E. T. Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books, 1976.

Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001.

Wierzbicka, A. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003.

Hyland, K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman, 2000.

Kasper, G., Blum-Kulka, S. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Erasmus+ Programme Guide 2025. European Commission, 2025.

English as a Medium of Instruction in Uzbekistan. British Council Uzbekistan.

“Uzbekistan–2030” Strategy. Official portal of the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Nasrullaev, J. (2026). Pragmatic Asymmetry in Multilingual Academic Communication. Journal of Language Pedagogy and Innovative Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1997/bc38wh52