Developing Economic Reasoning through Financial Document Inquiry in Undergraduate Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1997/7maprw91Keywords:
teaching economics, financial documents, inquiry learning, economic reasoning, unit costs, financial literacy, instructional scaffoldingAbstract
Financial documents can make economics teaching concrete, but their classroom use frequently stops at calculating ratios or identifying accounting discrepancies. This conceptual and methodological article develops an inquiry sequence in which students reconstruct an economic problem from a bounded set of financial records, examine competing explanations, and communicate a conditional decision. The framework draws on research in economics education, problem based learning, cognitive load, and financial literacy assessment. Its contribution is a distinction between document accuracy, accounting interpretation, and economic inference, with separate learning outcomes for each. An illustrative teaching dataset demonstrates why increasing expenditure does not necessarily indicate declining efficiency and why a balanced account does not establish an efficient allocation. The article supplies a staged inquiry protocol, a document design matrix, a worked analysis, and an evaluation strategy. The proposed sequence combines explicit instruction with progressively reduced support. No participant data or empirical intervention results are reported.
Downloads
References
Allgood, S., Walstad, W. B., & Siegfried, J. J. (2015). Research on teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(2), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.2.285
Araya, F., Blanchard, P., Cárdenas, J. C., Failache, E., & Perazzo, I. (2026). Another way of teaching microeconomics: Impact evaluation of the CORE project. Economica, 93(371), 992–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70045
Barrera, S., Sajadi, S., Holmes, M., & Jacobson, S. (2024). Valuing identity in the classroom: What economics can learn from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(3), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.38.3.163
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Tipoe, E., & Becker, R. (n.d.). Doing economics: Empirical projects. CORE Econ. Retrieved October 14, 2026, from https://books.core-econ.org/doing-economics/index.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sukhrob Akhmedov (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


