Developing Economic Reasoning through Financial Document Inquiry in Undergraduate Teaching

Authors

  • Sukhrob Akhmedov Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1997/7maprw91

Keywords:

teaching economics, financial documents, inquiry learning, economic reasoning, unit costs, financial literacy, instructional scaffolding

Abstract

Financial documents can make economics teaching concrete, but their classroom use frequently stops at calculating ratios or identifying accounting discrepancies. This conceptual and methodological article develops an inquiry sequence in which students reconstruct an economic problem from a bounded set of financial records, examine competing explanations, and communicate a conditional decision. The framework draws on research in economics education, problem based learning, cognitive load, and financial literacy assessment. Its contribution is a distinction between document accuracy, accounting interpretation, and economic inference, with separate learning outcomes for each. An illustrative teaching dataset demonstrates why increasing expenditure does not necessarily indicate declining efficiency and why a balanced account does not establish an efficient allocation. The article supplies a staged inquiry protocol, a document design matrix, a worked analysis, and an evaluation strategy. The proposed sequence combines explicit instruction with progressively reduced support. No participant data or empirical intervention results are reported.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Sukhrob Akhmedov

    Head of the Internal Audit and Financial Control Service, Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

References

Allgood, S., Walstad, W. B., & Siegfried, J. J. (2015). Research on teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(2), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.2.285

Araya, F., Blanchard, P., Cárdenas, J. C., Failache, E., & Perazzo, I. (2026). Another way of teaching microeconomics: Impact evaluation of the CORE project. Economica, 93(371), 992–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70045

Barrera, S., Sajadi, S., Holmes, M., & Jacobson, S. (2024). Valuing identity in the classroom: What economics can learn from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(3), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.38.3.163

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Tipoe, E., & Becker, R. (n.d.). Doing economics: Empirical projects. CORE Econ. Retrieved October 14, 2026, from https://books.core-econ.org/doing-economics/index.html

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Akhmedov, S. (2026). Developing Economic Reasoning through Financial Document Inquiry in Undergraduate Teaching. Journal of Language Pedagogy and Innovative Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1997/7maprw91